IDL-BNC @ IDRC >
IDRC / CRDI >
IDRC Research Results / Résultats de recherches du CRDI >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda|
|Authors: ||Kabakyenga, Jerome K|
Pettersson, Karen O
|Issue Date: ||16-Nov-2011|
|Citation: ||Kabakyenga, J. K., Östergren, P., Turyakira, E., & Pettersson, K. O. (2011). Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda. Reproductive Health, 8 (33). doi:10.1186/1742-4755-8-33|
|Abstract: ||Background: Improving knowledge of obstetric danger signs and promoting birth preparedness practices are
strategies aimed at enhancing utilization of skilled care in low-income countries. The aim of the study was to
explore the association between knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness among recently
delivered women in south-western Uganda.
Methods: The study included 764 recently delivered women from 112 villages in Mbarara district. Community
survey methods were used and 764 recently delivered women from 112 villages in Mbarara district were included
in study. Interviewer administered questionnaire were used to collect data. Logistic regression analyses were
conducted to explore the relationship between knowledge of key danger signs and birth preparedness.
Results: Fifty two percent of women knew at least one key danger sign during pregnancy, 72% during delivery
and 72% during postpartum. Only 19% had knowledge of 3 or more key danger signs during the three periods. Of
the four birth preparedness practices; 91% had saved money, 71% had bought birth materials, 61% identified a
health professional and 61% identified means of transport. Overall 35% of the respondents were birth prepared.
The relationship between knowledge of at least one key danger sign during pregnancy or during postpartum and
birth preparedness showed statistical significance which persisted after adjusting for probable confounders (OR 1.8,
95% CI: 1.2-2.6) and (OR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-3.0) respectively. Young age and high levels of education had synergistic
effect on the relationship between knowledge and birth preparedness. The associations between knowledge of at
least one key danger sign during childbirth or knowledge that prolonged labour was a key danger sign and birth
preparedness were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The prevalence of recently delivered women who had knowledge of key danger signs or those who
were birth prepared was very low. Since the majority of women attend antenatal care sessions, the quality and
methods of delivery of antenatal care education require review so as to improve its effectiveness. Universal primary
and secondary education programmes ought to be promoted so as to enhance the impact of knowledge of key
danger signs on birth preparedness practices.|
|Project Number: ||103460|
|Project Title: ||Teasdale-Corti Global Health Research Partnership|
|Appears in Collections:||2010-2019 / Années 2010-2019|
Health Systems Research / recherche sur les systèmes de santé
Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health (MNCH) / la santé de la mère, du nouveau-né, et de l’enfant
Teasdale-Corti Global Health Research Partnership (TC) / partenariat Teasdale-Corti de recherche en santé mondiale
Research Results (GHRI) / Résultats de recherches (IRSM)
IDRC Research Results / Résultats de recherches du CRDI
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.