IDL-BNC @ IDRC >
IDRC / CRDI >
IDRC Research Results / Résultats de recherches du CRDI >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10625/42173

Title: Dialogue of theory and empirical evidence : a weighted decision and tenurial niche approach to reviewing the operation of natural resource policy in rural Southern Africa
Authors: University of the Western Cape, Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies
Mandondo, Alois
University of Zimbabwe, Centre for Applied Social Sciences
Keywords: DECENTRALISED NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
LAND TENURE
LAND USE
DECENTRALIZATION
LAND MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
SOUTHERN AFRICA
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, ZA
Series/Report no.: Commons Southern Africa occasional paper series; 10
Abstract: Considerable research has been conducted on community-based natural resource management in rural southern Africa. Many interesting insights have accumulated from the literature on the research issues of earlier generations. The challenge is to break new ground by unravelling insights relevant to later generations. This study identifies the issue of scale in complex natural resource management systems as one of the more important among emerging issues in the sector. The study develops a theoretical framework implying trade-offs between deciding for others, deciding with others and deciding for oneself in the operation of natural resource policy. This weighted decision framework is used to critically interrogate the human ecology of land and resource use across a variety of tenurial niches in rural southern Africa. The study argues that in arriving at decisions regarding the operation of natural resource policy, the emphasis needs to shift from what should be done, to how it should be done. The study suggests that the ‘how it should be done’ of policy operation is a calibration problem. The calibration problem concerns itself with reconciling diverse preferences through the medium of decisions made for others, with others and for oneself. It is concluded that negotiation provides the most appropriate basis for calibration since it reconciles the contradictions within and among decisions made for others, with others and for oneself.
Description: Copublished with Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe
CASS/PLAAS occasion paper series
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10625/42173
Project Number: 101807
Project Title: New Approaches to People-centred Natural Resource Management for Development - Phase II
Document Delivery: To enquire about document delivery, contact the IDRC Library : reference@idrc.ca or 613-696-2578 / Pour plus de renseignements sur la livraison de documents, communiquer avec la bibliothèque du CRDI : reference@idrc.ca ou 613-696-2578
Appears in Collections:IDRC Research Results / Résultats de recherches du CRDI
2000-2009 / Années 2000-2009
Research Results (RPE) / Résultats de recherches (PRE)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
129690.pdf
395.56 kBAdobe PDF
IDRC staff can log in using their network password; non-IDRC staff can request this document.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback