<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/34912</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T02:24:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction to special issue: Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Latin America: a study on channels and benefits from the perspective of firms and researchers</title>
      <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50644</link>
      <description>Title: Introduction to special issue: Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Latin America: a study on channels and benefits from the perspective of firms and researchers
Authors: Dutrénit, Gabriela
Abstract: This special issue discusses the relative effectiveness of different channels of interaction between&#xD;
public research organisations (PROs) and industry in driving specific types of benefits for researchers&#xD;
and firms in Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica and Mexico). The empirical&#xD;
evidence comes from original micro-data collected through similar questionnaires sent to the managers&#xD;
of firms and PRO researchers in each country. The richness of this special issue results from its origin:&#xD;
it emerges as a joint motivation to understand a key aspect of PRO–industry interactions through the&#xD;
relationship between channels and benefits.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50644</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America</title>
      <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50643</link>
      <description>Title: Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America
Authors: Arza, Valeria
Abstract: There are both benefits and risks involved in interactions between public research organisations&#xD;
(PROs) and industry. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that associates firms’ and PROs’&#xD;
motivations, channels of interaction and benefits. It suggests that each channel triggers predominant&#xD;
types of benefits and claims that policy-making to support PRO–industry (PRO-I) interactions should&#xD;
be selective. Policy design must take into consideration the skill-related characteristics of the actors,&#xD;
and the characteristics of the interaction channels in order to achieve the best possible balance between&#xD;
the benefits and risks of PRO-I interactions. The geographical focus of the discussion is Latin America.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50643</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Academy-industry links in Brazil: evidence about channels and benefits for firms and researchers</title>
      <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50642</link>
      <description>Title: Academy-industry links in Brazil: evidence about channels and benefits for firms and researchers
Authors: Fernandes, A C; Campello de Souza, B; Stamford da Silva, A; Suzigan, W; Chaves, C V
Abstract: Knowledge flows between universities, public research institutes and firms may take various channels&#xD;
according to agents’ motivations and expected benefits. Models were estimated to investigate which&#xD;
channels of interaction lead to which benefits for firms, universities and research institutes in Brazil.&#xD;
Bi-directional channels are shown to be particularly relevant, yielding both innovative and productive&#xD;
benefits for the firms and intellectual and economic benefits for the universities. As for interactions&#xD;
between firms and research institutes, bi-directional channels are the most important in terms of&#xD;
intellectual benefits for the researchers and innovative benefits for the firms. These findings seem to&#xD;
confirm the dual role of the universities, versus a more focused one for the research institutes, and raise&#xD;
policy issues. Moreover, a negative correlation between investment in internal research and&#xD;
development and productive benefits for the firms was found, indicating that the expected benefits of&#xD;
public expenditure are not turning into innovation.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50642</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina</title>
      <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50641</link>
      <description>Title: Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina
Authors: Arza, Valeria; Vazquez, Claudia
Abstract: There are various channels for the exchange of knowledge between public research organisations&#xD;
(PROs) and industry (I). This paper discusses the relative effectiveness of different channels in&#xD;
Argentina. We use micro-data from surveys on firms and researchers to confirm that specific channels&#xD;
of PRO-I interactions are predominantly associated with specific types of benefits. While the service&#xD;
channel is effective for driving the benefits for researchers, the traditional channel does so for firms.&#xD;
However, we find that only the bi-directional channel ensures long-term benefits simultaneously for&#xD;
both actors. Moreover, we show that firms’ innovative capabilities and researchers’ knowledge skills&#xD;
interfere in the channels–benefits relationship. Therefore, the promotion of PRO-I interactions should&#xD;
be designed in accordance with the types of benefits being targeted and should take account of the&#xD;
knowledge characteristics of the actors involved in the interaction.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50641</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico</title>
      <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50640</link>
      <description>Title: Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico
Authors: Dutrénit, Gabriela; De Fuentes, Claudia; Torres, Arturo
Abstract: The process of knowledge transfer between public research organisations and industry occurs through&#xD;
multiple channels of interaction, however, there are differences in terms of the benefits that the agents&#xD;
perceive. Based on micro-data, this paper explores which channels are the most effective for triggering&#xD;
different benefits perceived by researchers and firms involved in such interactions in Mexico. The&#xD;
results suggest that researchers obtain intellectual benefits from the bi-directional and the traditional&#xD;
channels. Firms obtain benefits related to production activities and innovation strategies from the bidirectional&#xD;
and the services channels, while the traditional channel only provides production-related&#xD;
benefits. These results raise different policy issues. First, fostering the bi-directional channel could&#xD;
contribute to building virtuous circles. Secondly, it is necessary to align the incentives to foster other&#xD;
channels of interaction. Thirdly, a change in the researchers’ incentives is required to induce new&#xD;
benefits from interactions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50640</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

