<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/46753">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/46753</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50837" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50836" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50835" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50647" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50646" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T18:16:09Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50837">
    <title>Analysing the cost of adapting to climate change</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50837</link>
    <description>Title: Analysing the cost of adapting to climate change
Authors: Fisher, Suzanne</description>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50836">
    <title>Stakeholder-focused cost-benefit analysis in the water sector : guidance report</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50836</link>
    <description>Title: Stakeholder-focused cost-benefit analysis in the water sector : guidance report
Authors: Chambwera, Muyeye; Baulcomb, Corinne; Lunduka, Rodney; de Bresser, Laura; Chaudhury, Abrar</description>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50835">
    <title>Stakeholder-focused cost-benefit analysis in the water sector : synthesis report</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50835</link>
    <description>Title: Stakeholder-focused cost-benefit analysis in the water sector : synthesis report
Authors: Lunduka, Rodney; Bezabih, Mintewab; Chaudhury, Abrar</description>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50647">
    <title>Can renewable energy technologies improve the management of stressed water resources threatened by climate change</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50647</link>
    <description>Title: Can renewable energy technologies improve the management of stressed water resources threatened by climate change
Authors: Nadal, Gustavo Horacio; Bravo, Gonzalo; Girardin, Leonidas Osvaldo; Gortari, Sebastián
Abstract: This work addresses increasing concerns about water management for rural&#xD;
productive activities in the vast dry regions of Latin America by assessing renewable&#xD;
energy technologies (RETs) that could be suitable for localized needs. Forecasted trends in&#xD;
climate change and variability make this analysis very relevant, in an area where very little&#xD;
published work exists. While Argentina is widely known for its fertile pampas, around 75&#xD;
% of the country consists of dry lands. In addition, erosion is increasing by up to 650,000&#xD;
hectares each year. The coordinated adoption of a set of actions, including land use&#xD;
planning and strengthening productive activities that guarantee access to water and&#xD;
improve water and soil management is needed. Renewable energies could help towards&#xD;
achieving these aims, if water is made available at affordable costs and with suitable&#xD;
technologies. This paper evaluates experiences with three RETs—photovoltaic pumping&#xD;
from deep wells, small wind turbine pumping, and high-power wind turbines, and discusses&#xD;
a potential role for use in rural Argentina. Although cheaper and more reliable renewable&#xD;
alternatives to energy sources such as diesel could be used for pumping from groundwater&#xD;
resources in isolated locations, limitations arise when pumping head and/or water volume&#xD;
requirements are large or highly seasonal. The cost increases and technical challenges of&#xD;
accessing this deeper water, as indicated by case studies, emphasize the importance of&#xD;
planning and support schemes development.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50646">
    <title>Barriers to flood risk adaptation: A case study of cross‐scale collaboration in the informal settlement of Graveyard Pond</title>
    <link>http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca:80/dspace/handle/10625/50646</link>
    <description>Title: Barriers to flood risk adaptation: A case study of cross‐scale collaboration in the informal settlement of Graveyard Pond
Authors: Orangio, Christina
Abstract: There is a growing concern over the increase in extreme events expected as part of&#xD;
climate change. Good governance is a critical component of managing current climate&#xD;
risk that can help to adapt to future impacts of climate change. Understanding current&#xD;
governance is critical in urban areas where local government plays a key role in&#xD;
providing infrastructure to reduce the vulnerability of low-income populations.&#xD;
However, there is a gap in the literature regarding how cross-scale collaboration,&#xD;
particularly the relationship between non-governmental and governmental actors, affects&#xD;
adaptation.&#xD;
In Cape Town, South Africa the vulnerability of informal settlements to flooding is a&#xD;
growing concern due to their location in low-lying areas and wetlands. Using a single&#xD;
case study approach, the barriers to adaptation to flooding were examined and identified,&#xD;
with a focus on cross-scale collaboration, in an informal settlement in a detention pond.&#xD;
In order to understand cross-scale collaboration in this context, a nodal governance&#xD;
framework is used to analyze how actors at the community, intermediary, and&#xD;
government level interact and respond to flooding in informal settlements. The analysis&#xD;
shows that the community level is lacking the resources and technologies to adapt to&#xD;
flooding and there is a disconnect between the community level and the local government&#xD;
level, despite the existence of ward councillors. The nodal governance and barriers&#xD;
framework showed that the challenges actors face in adapting to flooding in Graveyard&#xD;
Pond relate to the different mentalities of the actors around flooding and in turn this&#xD;
affects how flooding is responded to. Additionally, the current flood management plan of&#xD;
the City of Cape Town leaves Graveyard Pond in an endless loop of disaster response and&#xD;
coping mechanisms that have not reduced the vulnerability of residents in the long-term.&#xD;
It is apparent from the data that there is a lack of cross-scale collaboration around&#xD;
responses to flooding in informal settlements. Though cross-scale collaboration comes&#xD;
with challenges, it is clear that this disconnect is acting as a barrier to adaptation to&#xD;
flooding in Graveyard Pond and needs to be explored further. This study provides&#xD;
insight into the barriers of adapting to urban flooding as well as how flooding is&#xD;
responded to in informal settlements in order to increase adaptive capacity to future&#xD;
climate change.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

